It's The packaging That's development You Fat

PEPSICO - It's The packaging That's development You Fat

Good morning. Today, I learned all about PEPSICO - It's The packaging That's development You Fat. Which may be very helpful for me and you. It's The packaging That's development You Fat

So what else is new? We blame packaging for just about all things along with global warming (tee hee), so why not accuse it of production us Fat too?

What I said. It shouldn't be in conclusion that the true about PEPSICO . You check this out article for home elevators an individual wish to know is PEPSICO .

PEPSICO

It's hard to buy a food product without some type of "fat" marketing message. Low fat, less carbs, sugarless and so on, but are these claims accurate? Are population getting fatter because they can't read the package? Is the packaging production them fat because it misleads the consumer? Can't we understand quantum control or are we all slaves to the "supersize me" trend that permeates marketing messages?

Last week, some of the world's top food and drink makers joined in a commitment to furnish European consumers with better fat and sugar content data on their packaging. In a move to stem the growing problem of obesity in Europe, Coca-Cola Co., Groupe Danone, Kellogg Co., Kraft Foods Inc., Nestle Sa, PepsiCo Inc. And Unilever Nv said they will put at-a-glance calorie content data on the front of their packaging, and more detailed lists of ingredients along with sugar, fat, sodium and carbohydrates on the back. You know, this is the data on the box that you are supposed to read. So that begs the question, do we ignore labels and only read about the ingredients?

Some population would have you believe that the buyer has no accountability for their own condition and well being. Consider that McDonalds was taken to task by the media recently because a generation of kids eating at McDonalds have come to be fat. The claim was that the kids' obesity was caused by the lack of data on the packaging. They did not know how fattening the Big Mac was because it did not have that data on the burger's package. In response, McDonalds is putting "fat facts" on their packaging. Let's wait and see the result. Do you think there will be less fat kids in a merge of years?

The most recent buzz is about the "unit basis" or the fact that what is eaten as a quantum is dictated by the size of the quantum served. So I guess if you serve me an whole box of cereal, I'll eat the whole thing. The jury is still out on this one.

But seriously, this is where packaging comes into play. I wrote about this previously in my report "100 fat Snacks - Smart or Stupid." The point is the product is marketed and portioned as such (100 fat as a snack) regardless of what the actual product estimate might be. So be wary of what goes on your packaging, what claims you make and how the buyer will react to them. Watch out for so called "fat" statements on your product packaging. They could come back to haunt you.

When determining what the box promises the product can do, think about the following:

o Can your statements be verified?

o Can they be construed as misleading?

o Can consumers blame the product instead of themselves?

o Can any statement you make be fodder for the media?

If any of the questions originate a yes answer, beware of the "Packaging Police." They could be out after you, especially if they think your packaging makes them fat.

Please feel free to use me as a reserved supply when it comes to understanding what packaging markets are hot and what are not. Or what fellowships are developing the most recent in innovative packaging technology.

I hope you have new knowledge about PEPSICO . Where you can offer used in your day-to-day life. And above all, your reaction is passed about PEPSICO .